Recent Battery Energy Storage Facility Developments
The following recent developments in New York State highlight ongoing safety, land-use, and emergency-response concerns related to large battery energy storage systems (BESS)
TOWN UPDATES
1/19/20261 min read
Warwick, NY – Lithium-Ion Battery Storage Facility
During the December 2025 fire, Orange County HazMat conducted air monitoring around the Warwick BESS site focused on immediate public health thresholds.
Monitoring detected hydrogen cyanide near the facility at levels reported below federal exposure limits, with downwind monitors showing no exceedances at the time.
Officials and reporting later acknowledged that the monitoring was limited in duration and scope and primarily designed to detect short-term exposure risks.
Community members and environmental advocates raised concerns that the monitoring may not have captured all hazardous byproducts of a lithium-ion battery fire or potential longer-term exposure impacts.
Requests were made for additional and independent testing, including extended air sampling and environmental (soil and water) analysis.
Holtsville, NY – Savion Energy Battery Storage Facility
A proposed Savion Energy battery storage facility in Holtsville was denied a required variance by Suffolk County.
The denial was based on plans to store large quantities of petroleum-based fuel on-site to power backup generators.
These generators are intended to run cooling fans during power outages, which developers state are necessary to prevent battery overheating.
County officials determined the volume of flammable fuel exceeded local safety and land-use limits.
The petroleum storage tanks and fuel requirements were not disclosed during earlier phases of the project review, raising concerns about incomplete initial disclosures.
Energy storage experts have noted that similar backup power and fuel storage systems are likely required at other large-scale BESS sites to maintain cooling during grid failures.
Following the variance denial, the developer initiated legal action challenging Suffolk
County’s decision.
